我个人感觉还是不错的，线路就不指望直连了，我这走cf还是不错的，晚高峰拉胯，最好就是凌晨的时候，我这直连能跑到500M的带宽

不知道为啥我看别的rn的2h2g跑不了unixBench，我用之前一个mjj整合脚本里面的unixBench能跑，看了下跑分，没我之前买的假鲨鱼的高,但假鲨鱼那时不时失联就不谈了。不知道rn会不会也跑路，看那么多人提醒，还是pp上车，用半年就赚。

还有一个问题就是，rn的机器大部分都会出现谷歌验证，这个走ipv6隧道可以解。

有aff：https://my.racknerd.com/aff.php?aff=1453&pid=344

无aff：https://my.racknerd.com/aff.php?pid=344

BYTEUNIXBenchmarks(Version5.1.3)

System:racknerd-05675a:GNU/Linux
OS:GNU/Linux--4.14.168-bbrplus--#1SMPWedJan2915:44:04CST2020
Machine:x86_64(unknown)
Language:en_US.utf8(charmap="UTF-8",collate="UTF-8")
CPU0:Intel(R)Xeon(R)[email protected](5600.0bogomips)

  x86-64,MMX,PhysicalAddressExt,SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,SYSCALL/SYSRET

CPU1:Intel(R)Xeon(R)[email protected](5600.0bogomips)

  x86-64,MMX,PhysicalAddressExt,SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,SYSCALL/SYSRET

14:04:36up1day,58min, 2users, loadaverage:0.08,0.05,0.01;runlevel5

BenchmarkRun:SatNov07202014:04:36-14:32:35
2CPUsinsystem;running1parallelcopyoftests

Dhrystone2usingregistervariables 34066331.5lps (10.0s,7samples)
Double-PrecisionWhetstone 5145.4MWIPS(9.4s,7samples)
ExeclThroughput 3148.6lps (30.0s,2samples)
FileCopy1024bufsize2000maxblocks 470021.3KBps (30.0s,2samples)
FileCopy256bufsize500maxblocks 123168.0KBps (30.0s,2samples)
FileCopy4096bufsize8000maxblocks 1195766.9KBps (30.0s,2samples)
PipeThroughput 703322.8lps (10.0s,7samples)
Pipe-basedContextSwitching 85269.8lps (10.0s,7samples)
ProcessCreation 5454.3lps (30.0s,2samples)
ShellScripts(1concurrent) 7695.8lpm (60.0s,2samples)
ShellScripts(8concurrent) 1547.1lpm (60.0s,2samples)
SystemCallOverhead 403563.3lps (10.0s,7samples)

SystemBenchmarksIndexValues BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone2usingregistervariables 116700.0 34066331.5 2919.1
Double-PrecisionWhetstone 55.0 5145.4 935.5
ExeclThroughput 43.0 3148.6 732.2
FileCopy1024bufsize2000maxblocks 3960.0 470021.3 1186.9
FileCopy256bufsize500maxblocks 1655.0 123168.0 744.2
FileCopy4096bufsize8000maxblocks 5800.0 1195766.9 2061.7
PipeThroughput 12440.0 703322.8 565.4
Pipe-basedContextSwitching 4000.0 85269.8 213.2
ProcessCreation 126.0 5454.3 432.9
ShellScripts(1concurrent) 42.4 7695.8 1815.1
ShellScripts(8concurrent) 6.0 1547.1 2578.6
SystemCallOverhead 15000.0 403563.3 269.0

                                        ========

SystemBenchmarksIndexScore 887.6

BenchmarkRun:SatNov07202014:32:35-15:00:38
2CPUsinsystem;running2parallelcopiesoftests

Dhrystone2usingregistervariables 67556435.3lps (10.0s,7samples)
Double-PrecisionWhetstone 10361.0MWIPS(9.4s,7samples)
ExeclThroughput 6088.6lps (30.0s,2samples)
FileCopy1024bufsize2000maxblocks 823501.4KBps (30.0s,2samples)
FileCopy256bufsize500maxblocks 213173.9KBps (30.0s,2samples)
FileCopy4096bufsize8000maxblocks 2395331.5KBps (30.0s,2samples)
PipeThroughput 1405793.0lps (10.0s,7samples)
Pipe-basedContextSwitching 272479.1lps (10.0s,7samples)
ProcessCreation 9710.7lps (30.0s,2samples)
ShellScripts(1concurrent) 11037.9lpm (60.0s,2samples)
ShellScripts(8concurrent) 1644.9lpm (60.1s,2samples)
SystemCallOverhead 784962.7lps (10.0s,7samples)

SystemBenchmarksIndexValues BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone2usingregistervariables 116700.0 67556435.3 5788.9
Double-PrecisionWhetstone 55.0 10361.0 1883.8
ExeclThroughput 43.0 6088.6 1416.0
FileCopy1024bufsize2000maxblocks 3960.0 823501.4 2079.5
FileCopy256bufsize500maxblocks 1655.0 213173.9 1288.1
FileCopy4096bufsize8000maxblocks 5800.0 2395331.5 4129.9
PipeThroughput 12440.0 1405793.0 1130.1
Pipe-basedContextSwitching 4000.0 272479.1 681.2
ProcessCreation 126.0 9710.7 770.7
ShellScripts(1concurrent) 42.4 11037.9 2603.3
ShellScripts(8concurrent) 6.0 1644.9 2741.6
SystemCallOverhead 15000.0 784962.7 523.3

                                        ========

SystemBenchmarksIndexScore 1640.0

=======Scriptdescriptionandscorecomparisoncompleted!=======

引用:foxsite1发表于2020-11-716:23

超售了，目前看速度大不如前


网友回复:

配置和路线很重要，更重要的是维护啊！打击滥用，才能留住mjj


网友回复:

引用:alenxu发表于2020-11-813:56

您好，我们从来不超售的，你可以看看那个测试的结果，你说的问题应该是当地的网络波动，大家都知道现在除...


网友回复:

引用:我来了发表于2020-11-814:08

能退余额吗